hacklink makrobettaraftarium24justin tvselcuksportstaraftarium24taraftarium24taraftarium24selcuksportsstreameastz libraryเว็บสล็อตStreamEastbycasinotaraftarium24deneme bonusuGalabet신용카드현금화justin tvyurtdışı turtaraftarium24taraftarium24taraftarium24搜狗输入法下载taraftarium24jojobetjojobetjojobethttps://www.newstrendline.com/Porno siteleri HDmygiftcanlı sıcak sohbetsikiş izleFutemaxPelota Libresheratonkingtaraftarium24www.giftcardmall.com/mygiftStreamEastStreamEastkralbetjustin tvdizipalbets10fixbetstreameastdizipaljojobetcasino sitelericasibomcasibomvdcasinojojobettaraftarium24vippark girisjustin tvtaraftarium24casino sitelerijojobetcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevantcasinolevanttaraftariumbetciojojobetjojoAnkara Escorthacklink panel
Voices

FDR Would Call Trump A Fascist

by Michael Joseph Roberto

I’ll put it this way. It is a matter of history.

Many among us fear that Donald Trump and the mass movement he leads pose an existential threat to American Democracy.

As a historian who has written about the origins of American fascism, it is my belief that Trump and Trumpism, as a sweeping and totalizing force, are fascist.

Trumpism is the verve of American fascism, a menacing and hateful spirit driving people toward the destruction of the nation in the name of saving it. This distinguishes fascism from all political ideologies on the right that seek to conserve or preserve existing forms of rule, and by reactionary and militant means when necessary.

In this case, we might ask if the intensity and zeal of Trumpism would abate should its leader be
denounced for what he is, a homegrown, fascist demagogue planning on re-entering the White
House one way or another, as recent history has aptly demonstrated.

This is why Judge Tanya Chutkan’s decision to make public the 165-page brief by Special
Council Jack Smith is so crucial to placing Trump’s actions in historical context. We are now in a
parallel moment with an earlier time when the peril of fascism was real, here in the United States
and elsewhere.

Allow me to make my case in accordance with Smith’s.

As Smith and his team argue, Trump functioned as a private person, specifically, as a candidate
for re-election, when refusing to protect his own vice-president, Mike Pence, from a mob Trump
himself had inspired to go to the White House.

Many who stormed the Capitol were holding signs and banners, or shouting at the top of their
lungs, to hang Pence. Who put them up to it? Who was bent on doing what he needed to do to
get what he wanted – only to have it fail in the end!

Throughout the entire sequence of events outlined by Smith, it was clear that the Constitution
and the democratic principles it upholds, as well as the implicit ethics the office requires, were
never on Trump’s mind as his followers wreaked havoc and destruction throughout the chambers
of the Capitol.

These simple facts, palpable and incontrovertible, compel us as citizens to denounce Trump.

And here’s why history matters.

On April 29, 1938, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt sent a message to Congress requesting
that it create and fund a committee to examine the growing concentration of wealth and political
power in the American economy.

Roosevelt, certainly no socialist, understood that America’s leading corporations and financial
institutions had become a system of power steadily eroding competitive enterprise, which he
revered as the backbone of American democracy. By the late 1930s, monopoly-finance capital
had become hegemonic in American capitalism, and as Roosevelt saw this, the greatest internal
threat to democracy.

So, what is the parallel between then and now?

As Roosevelt wrote to legislators, the rise of fascism in Europe had brought home “two simple
truths” to all Americans:

“The first truth is that the liberty of democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of
private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its
essence, is Fascism – ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other
controlling private power.

“The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not
provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way as to sustain an acceptable
standard of living.”

Now consider this definition in relation to Trump and Trumpism.

The intent of Jack Smith’s brief is to demonstrate that Trump functioned as a private individual,
and in so doing represented what he took to be his undisputed rule over the Republican Party, a
private group, to attempt deceptively and maliciously to usurp constitutional government from
above and below.

Indeed, Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021, provide a striking example of Roosevelt’s first truth.

As Smith so ably shows us, Trump was determined to remain president no matter what it took,
and in so doing swept aside his public responsibilities as president, as commander-in-chief, all to
serve his private ends.

Trump actively sought to subvert constitutional democracy as a private individual, consciously
ignoring his official, public obligations as the president.

According to Roosevelt’s definition, Donald Trump is a fascist dictator in the making and
Trumpism is the force totale made real by the growth of a mass movement, the Republican Party,
and business partners at all levels of American business enterprise directed toward the control
and ownership of the domestic economy.

From top to bottom, these private entities are systematically destroying the legal legitimacy of
local and regional governments while privatizing public space – all in the name of progress. Elon
Musk, the richest man in the world, now surpasses all Trump’s minions as the prophet and guru
of Trumpism.

This is the meaning of monopoly in its highest, i.e., final form in the period of Late Capitalism.

Can we really believe Trump and Trumpism, once triumphant, will provide employment aimed
at the production and distribution of goods required to achieve an acceptable standard of living
most Americans need and deserve in the twenty-first century?

Or will it be the American Behemoth at full strength, devouring and regurgitating everything in
its path until man and nature alike can no longer survive?

Roosevelt held to a viewpoint historians and others call the problem of good vs. bad capitalism.
Preserve and strengthen what is good by eliminating the bad.

Simply put, Roosevelt understood the source of bad capitalism in 1938, as fascist monopoly,
good capitalism as competitive enterprise and democratic. For those like me, this is a false
dichotomy of the first magnitude. But that is another discussion.

What matters most at this moment is this.

As citizens, we should call Trump what he is because our own history obliges us to do so. As my
own scholarship and writing have made clear, fascism emerges from within as opposed to
arriving from without. Contemporary world history also reveals that great enemies of democracy
cannot be defeated unless the people fighting them comprehend their character. Each one of us
can fulfill Roosevelt’s legacy by doing whatever we can to halt Trump’s march toward fascist
demagoguery.

In 1938, FDR’s definition of fascism came from his great wish to further social democracy in
America, however he deemed it possible.

At that moment, he had also become the symbolic leader of the struggle against fascism, here
and abroad.

This is worth pondering.

Michael Joseph Roberto is a musician, and writer who retired as an associate professor of contemporary world history from North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University in 2016. His first book, The Coming of The American Behemoth: The Origins of Fascism in the United States, 1920-1940 (Monthly Review Press) was published in 2018.